Ruslan Tiukaev vs Edison Ambarzumjan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Ambarzumjan leads with 47.54% of points won on their second serve, compared to Tiukaev's 34.47%. Is this an indication of a stronger service game? Yes, it can impact match outcomes.
• Return Game Strength: Tiukaev has the edge, winning 51.53% of points on their opponent's second serve, while Ambarzumjan wins 46.82%. How does this affect the match dynamics? Tiukaev's return game could counterbalance Ambarzumjan's service edge.
• Breakpoint Resilience: Ambarzumjan saves 62.5% of breakpoints, outperforming Tiukaev's 50.31% save rate. Can this be crucial during critical moments? Higher resilience could favor Ambarzumjan.
• Overall Match Performance: Over the past year, Tiukaev has a higher match win rate at 60%, compared to Ambarzumjan’s 44.74%. Does this suggest consistency? Yes, possibly indicating a more stable overall performance.
• Surface Preference: Ambarzumjan excels on Grass with a 67% win rate; Tiukaev performs best on Hard courts with a 62% win rate. Is surface type crucial here? It might be, depending on the current match surface.
• Event Level Experience: Tiukaev has a higher win rate of 60% in lower-tier tournaments compared to Ambarzumjan's 44.44%. Does competition level impact predictions? Playing against stronger opponents could sharpen skills.
• Opponent Quality: Tiukaev faces tougher opponents, with an average rank of 109.87, versus Ambarzumjan's 187.47. Could this make Tiukaev more battle-ready? Possibly, given the exposure to higher-ranked players.
• Deciding Set Performance: Tiukaev wins 54% of deciding sets, while Ambarzumjan struggles with a 20% win rate. If it reaches a decider, who might be more clutch? Tiukaev appears more reliable here.
• Break Point Conversion: Tiukaev has a slight advantage, converting 39.77% of breakpoints compared to Ambarzumjan’s 37.14%. Is this a key stat? Yes, especially during game-changing moments.

Editorial Prediction (June 5, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing the head-to-head stats, both Ambarzumjan and Tiukaev show unique strengths that could influence their upcoming match. Ambarzumjan has demonstrated superior performance in second serve success and breakpoint saving, crucial when facing break opportunities.

Tiukaev, on the other hand, showcases stronger return game stats and a higher overall match win rate. This suggests greater consistency across various match scenarios. Additionally, Tiukaev's ability to perform better in deciding sets may offer them an edge in tightly contested situations, posing challenges for Ambarzumjan.

While both players have their respective surface preferences, the deciding factors might lie in their match experience against higher-caliber opponents and recent form at similar event levels.

Considering these statistics, Tiukaev appears to have a slight advantage and is most likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming match.